U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1963

William T. Spence v. Balogh & Company, Inc.

William T. Spence v. Balogh & Company, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 28, 1963 · No. 17399_1 · Bazelon, Burger, Per Curiam, Washington
317 F.2d 909 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Cornelius H. Doherty, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Cornelius H. Doherty, Jr., Washington, D. G., was on the brief, for appellant., Mr. Alan L. Wurtzel, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Harold P. Green and Daniel M. Singer, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee.

William T. Spence v. Balogh & Company, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit brought by plaintiff-appellant to require delivery of certain shares of stock, or, alternatively, to recover money damages. The facts are set out in the opinion of District Judge Jones. 216 F.Supp. 492 (1962) 1 For the reasons given in that opinion, the judgment of the District Court, dismissing the action on its merits after trial, will be

Affirmed.

1

. See also Spence v. Northern Virginia Doctors Hospital Corp., 202 Va. 478, 117 S.E.2d 657 (1961).

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.