Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1963

Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co.

Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 24, 1963 · Pee
314 F.2d 274; 114 U.S. App. D.C. 269 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Miss Diana Kearny Powell, Washington, D. C., appellant, pro se, and for appellant Emilia L. Powell in No. 17181., Mr. Henry H. Paige, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Arthur P. Drury, John M. Lynham and John E. Powell, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellee National Savings and Trust Company., Mr. Benjamin W. Dulany, Washington, D. C., for appellee, Ogden, and certain other appellees in No. 17181., Mr. Nathan Wald, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee Annette I. Powell in No. 17181.

Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

The appeal in No. 17178, is from the judgment of the District Court denying appellant’s petition for letters of administration d. b. n., c. t. a. We have examined the record and find no abuse of discretion.

In No. 17181, appeal is taken from the District Court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment in which appellant Emilia L. Powell claimed the entire cor*275pus of the trust estate in fee. We hold that, appellant’s rights with respect to the trust estate are res judicata by our decision in Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 290, 296 F.2d 412, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 946, 82 S.Ct. 387, 7 L.Ed.2d 343 (1961).

The judgments in Nos. 17178 and 17181 are

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.