U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1964

Clarence Farmer v. United States

Clarence Farmer v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided December 31, 1964 · Prettyman, Fahy, Burger
341 F.2d 411; 119 U.S. App. D.C. 278 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Clarence Farmer v. United States

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of housebreaking and petit larceny. His counsel, appointed by this court, urges two grounds for reversal, (1) that two oral confessions made by appellant were involuntary, 1 and (2) the confessions were not corroborated. Upon consideration of the testimony as to the circumstances in which the confessions were made, and the evidence bearing on the issue of corroboration, we can accept neither ground as a basis for reversal.

Affirmed.

1

. One of the confessions was made to an officer in a telephone conversation prior to arrest. The other was made to the same officer at about the time of arrest of appellant at the apartment of a friend. Mallory v. United States, 354 U.S. 449, 77 S.Ct. 1356, 1 L.Ed.2d 1479 (1957), accordingly has no application

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.