U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1964

R. A. Holman & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 25, 1964

339 F.2d 752; 119 U.S. App. D.C. 253 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Edgar H. Brenner, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Milton V. Freeman and Werner J. Kronstein, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant., Mr. John D. Hawke, Jr., Washington, D. C., also entered an appearance for appellant in No. 18,444., Messrs. David Ferber, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Michael Joseph, Atty., Securities and Exchange Commission, with whom Messrs. Philip A. Loomis, Jr., Gen. Counsel, and John A. Dudley, Special Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission, were on the brief, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Gearhart & Otis, Inc., Frederick D. Gearhart, Jr. And Edward v. Otis v. Securities and Exchange Commission and United States of America (D.C. Cir. 1965)
R. A. Holman & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission (D.C. Cir. 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

This administrative proceeding has been before this court on three prior occasions. Securities & Exchange Com’n v. R. A. Holman & Co., 116 U.S.App.D.C. 279, 323 F.2d 284, cert, denied, 375 U.S. 943, 84 S.Ct. 350, 11 L.Ed.2d 274 (1963); R. A. Holman & Co. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 43, 299 F.2d 127, cert, denied, 370 U.S. 911, 82 S.Ct. 1257, 8 L.Ed.2d 404 (1962); R. A. Holman & Co., Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, No. 18300, petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition denied by order, January 28, 1964. For the reasons stated by this court in the two opinions cited, this present proceeding should be dismissed for failure of the appellant to exhaust its administrative remedies. ’

. It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.