Robert Moses v. Nicholas Deb. Katzenbach, Acting Attorney General of the United States
Cases that cite this one
23 later published cases cite this decision.
- Freida Seiden, Administratrix of the Estate of Roberta Levitt v. United States (6th Cir. 1976)
- Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Nelson A. Rockefeller (2d Cir. 1973)
- Harold Weisberg v. U.S. Department of Justice (D.C. Cir. 1973)
- Newman v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1967)
- In re Investigation Regarding Ringwood Fact Finding Committee Re Violation of N. J. S. A. 19:34-38.1 (N.J. 1974)
- Peek v. Mitchell (6th Cir. 1970)
- Peek v. Mitchell (6th Cir. 1970)
- Martha Nathan v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney General. Martha Nathan v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney General (D.C. Cir. 1984)
- Norman F. Dacey v. Peter C. Dorsey (2d Cir. 1978)
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Levi (District Court, District of Columbia 1976)
- Ralph Nader v. William Bart Saxbe (D.C. Cir. 1974)
- Nader v. Kleindienst (District Court, District of Columbia 1973)
- Diana Kearny Powell v. Nicholas Katzenbach, United States Attorney General (D.C. Cir. 1966)
- Ramos-Ruiz v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (District Court, D. Nevada 2025)
- O'Connor v. Doe (District Court, District of Columbia 2023)
- Sandoval v. Farish (Colo. 1984)
- Prosecution for Contempt of Congress of an Executive Branch Official Who Has Asserted a Claim of Executive Privilege (United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel 1984)
- Ayatollah Syed M. J. Iqbal Jafree v. John R. Barber, Acting Special Agent, Federal Bureau of Investigation (7th Cir. 1982)
- United States v. Bryson (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 1977)
- State's Atty v. City of Balto. (Md. 1975)
- State's Attorney v. Mayor of Baltimore (Md. 1975)
- Nader v. Saxbe (D.C. Cir. 1974)
- Kenneth Adams v. Elliot L. Richardson, Individuallyand as Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (D.C. Cir. 1973)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Robert MOSES et al., Appellants,
v.
Nicholas deB. KATZENBACH, Acting Attorney General of the United States, et al., Appellees.
No. 18065.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued November 6, 1964.
Decided February 16, 1965.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Luther W. Youngdahl, Judge.
Mr. William M. Kunstler, New York City, for appellants.
Mr. Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. John W. Douglas and Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., and John C. Eldridge, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the brief, for appellees.
Before BASTIAN, WRIGHT and McGOWAN, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed.
WRIGHT, Circuit Judge (concurring):
It seems more than passing strange, to me at least, that in some parts of this country citizens exercising their First Amendment rights of assembly, petition and free speech are arrested and convicted by the hundreds, while perpetrators of innumerable church bombings and burnings, kidnappings, beatings, maimings and murders of Negroes and civil rights workers are not prosecuted — or even apprehended. Perhaps, as appellants suggest, federal laws, or their enforcement, in this area are indeed inadequate. But I agree that an investigation as to the adequacy, or the execution, of these laws is not a matter within the jurisdiction of the judicial branch of this Government.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.