John Burke and Margaret M. Burke v. Upland Terrace, Inc., and District of Columbia
John Burke and Margaret M. Burke v. Upland Terrace, Inc., and District of Columbia
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court on a verdict directed in favor of the defendants, appellees, at the conclusion of the case in chief of plaintiffs, appellants. Their suit was for damages attributed to injuries to the female plaintiff suffered in a fall on an icy sidewalk in front of property owned by Upland Terrace, Inc. Within the principles governing the liability of the municipality in such cases, 1 and that of *363 the property owner, 2 we agree with the District Court that the plaintiffs’ evidence failed to make out a case warranting submission to the jury of the issues of liability.
Affirmed.
LEYENTHAL, Circuit Judge, took no part in the consideration and decision in this case.
. Smith v. District of Columbia, 89 U.S. App.D.C. 7, 189 F.2d 671; Lyons v. District of Columbia, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 278, 214 F.2d 203; Campbell v. District of Columbia, 100 U.S.App.D.C. 120, 243 F.2d 226; see District of Columbia v. Nordstrom, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 165, 327 F.2d 863; cf. District of Columbia v. McNeill, 120 U.S.App.D.C. -, 344 F.2d 195.
. Hecht Co. v. Hohensee, 65 App.D.C. 328. 83 F.2d 585, where it is said:
In Norville v. Hub Furniture Co., 59 App.D.C. 29, 32 F.2d 420, we held that, in the absence of statutory provision to the contrary, the owner or occupant of property owes no duty to pedestrians to keep the sidewalk in front of it free from ice and snow coming thereon from natural causes * * *.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.