U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1965

Diana Kearny Powell v. Henry H. Paige and John E. Powell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided December 9, 1965 · Burger, Wright, Leven-Thal

355 F.2d 108; 122 U.S. App. D.C. 397; 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 3716 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Miss Diana Kearny Powell, Washington, D. C., appellant pro se., Mr. Albert E. Brault, Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Neil T. NAFTALIN, Appellee (8th Cir. 1976)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The issues raised by this appeal have been before this court in one form or another on several occasions. See Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 290, 296 F.2d 412, cert. denied, 368 U.S. 946, 82 S.Ct. 387, 7 L.Ed.2d 343 (1961), rehearing denied, 368 U.S. 1005, 82 S.Ct. 597, 7 L.Ed.2d 547 (1962); Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co., 114 U.S.App.D.C. 269, 314 F.2d 274 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. *109 920, 85 S.Ct. 275, 13 L.Ed.2d 334 (1964), rehearing denied, 379 U.S. 984, 85 S.Ct. 643, 13 L.Ed.2d 577 (1965); Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, No. 17,658, decided November 19, 1963, rehearing en banc denied, January 15, 1964; Powell v. National Savings and Trust Company, No. 18,292, decided May 19, 1964. We have carefully considered the record, the briefs and the oral argument of appellant. We find nothing new contained therein which would require a reversal of the District Court’s judgment in this case.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.