U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1967

V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States

V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 13, 1967 · Edgerton, Burger, Wright
384 F.2d 979 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Harry I. Rand, Washington, D. C., for appellants., Mr. John C. Eldridge, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Messrs. David G. Bress, U. S. Atty., and Alan S. Rosenthal, Atty., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.

V.E.B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, Steelmasters, Inc. And Ercona Corporation v. Ramsey Clark, Acting Attorney General of the United States

Cases that cite this one

73 later published cases cite this decision. The 24 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.

On consideration whereof it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court, appealed from in this cause be, and it is hereby, affirmed for the reasons stated in Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, Jena, D.D.C., 40 F.R.D. 318 (1966).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.