U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1969

Bernard Lyon Frishman v. Mildred M. Stonebraker

Bernard Lyon Frishman v. Mildred M. Stonebraker
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 9, 1969 · Bazelon, Burger, Per Curiam, Robinson
408 F.2d 1269; 133 U.S. App. D.C. 66 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. D. Randolph Cole, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Stanley Klavan and Paul H. Mannes, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant., Mr. Seymour Friedman, with whom Mr. H. Max Ammerman, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellee.

Bernard Lyon Frishman v. Mildred M. Stonebraker

Cases that cite this one

17 later published cases cite this decision. The 15 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.

On consideration thereof it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment ... of the District Court appealed from in this cause is hereby affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the District Court in this case dated February 7, 1968, 295 F.Supp. 974.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.