U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1969

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided July 15, 1969 · Prettyman
417 F.2d 559 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Mr. Clifford D. Reznicek, New York City, of the bar of the Supreme Court of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheink-man, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,086 and inter-venor in No. 21,316., Mr. Elliott Moore, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Mr. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Mr. Harold B. Zanoff, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent in Nos. 21,086 and 21,316 and petitioner in No. 21,131., Mr. Osmond K. Fraenkel, New York City, for intervenor in No. 21,086, respondent in No. 21,131, and petitioner in No. 21,316.

Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge:

In this case the Labor Board set aside an election on account of unfair labor practices by an- employer and thereupon issued a bargaining order upon the evidence of authorization cards. Upon the authority of the opinion and decision of the Supreme Court in NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., et al.,1 the decision and ruling of the Board are affirmed. It will present an appropriate order of enforcement.

. 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.