Robert Schoop v. John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Robert Schoop v. John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States, 444 F.2d 863 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
143 U.S. App. D.C. 405; 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 12265
Wright, Robb, Wilk-Ey

Robert Schoop v. John N. Mitchell, Attorney General of the United States

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellants’ motion for (1) injunction pending appeal, (2) summary reversal, and (3) immediate hearing, of the motion of appellee Jerry V. Wilson to dismiss appeal as moot or for summary affirmance, of the motion of appellees Mitchell and Hoover to dismiss appeal for mootness or for summary affirmance, the opposition of appellee Jerry V. Wilson to motion of appellant for injunction pending appeal and for summary reversal, and of the opposition of appellees Mitchell and Hoover to motion for injunction pending appeal and summary reversal, and it appearing to the Court that appellant Sehoop has not submitted to federal custody, as this Court’s opinion in Dawkins v. Mitchell, 141 U.S.App.D.C. 213, 437 F.2d 646 (1970), requires him to do in order to obtain adjudication of his claims, and that the warrant for the arrest of appellant Dawkins for violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1073 (1964) has been dismissed, it is

Ordered by the Court that the dismissal of appellant Schoop’s action is summarily affirmed, and it is

Further ordered by the Court that the dismissal of appellant Dawkins’ action is vacated and this case remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss Dawkins’ action as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950); Gaddis v. Dixie Realty Co., 136 U.S.App.D.C. 403, 420 F.2d 245 (1969).

Reference

Full Case Name
Robert SCHOOP Et Al., Appellants, v. John N. MITCHELL, Attorney General of the United States, Et Al.
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published