Ashton ex rel. Lindsey v. Pierce
Ashton ex rel. Lindsey v. Pierce
232 U.S. App. D.C. 367; 723 F.2d 70
(United States Reports)
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Multi-Family Management, Inc. v. Hancock (D.C. 1995)
- Davis Ex Rel. Davis v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (3d Cir. 1997)
- Simmons v. Charleston Housing Authority (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 1995)
- Henry Horner Mothers Guild v. Chicago Hous. Auth. (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1991)
- Henry Horner Mothers Guild v. Chicago Housing Authority (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1991)
- Tinsley v. Kemp (District Court, W.D. Missouri 1990)
- Curtis v. Housing Authority of the City of Oakland (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 1990)
- McNeill v. New York City Housing Authority (District Court, S.D. New York 1989)
- Concerned Tenants of Father Panik Village v. Pierce (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 1988)
- Edwards v. District of Columbia (District Court, District of Columbia 1985)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
On consideration of the Motion of the Secretary to Amend the Opinion of August 26, 1983 [716 F.2d 56] and of the responsive pleadings filed with respect thereto, it is
ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted, and the opinion of August 26, 1983 is amended as follows:
At page 67, the new paragraph:
Beginning at line 22, delete the following two sentences:
It would be anomalous indeed if Congress did not also intend to make compliance with the regulations a condition of obtaining direct annual contributions under 42 U.S.C. § 1437c (1976). We have previously recognized that these contributions are an important tool in coercing local housing agencies’ compliance with federally mandated conditions. See Knox Hill Tenant Council v. Washington, 448 F.2d 1045, 1048 (D.C.Cir. 1971).
At page 67:
Beginning at line 17, delete the following sentence:
Further, it is the duty of the Department under the Contract to ensure that the Authority keeps its promises or forfeits its right to annual contributions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.