U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1987

Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. U.S. Attorney General

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 12, 1987 · Wald, Robinson, Mikva, Edwards, Ginsburg, Bork, Starr, Silberman, Buckley, Williams

808 F.2d 847; 257 U.S. App. D.C. 243 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

Seed Company Limited v. Westerman (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
Jones v. Bernanke (District Court, District of Columbia 2010)
McWay v. Lahood (District Court, District of Columbia 2010)
Jones v. Greenspan (District Court, District of Columbia 2010)
McWay v. LaHood (D.C. Cir. 2010)
Graham v. Mukasey (District Court, District of Columbia 2009)
Graham v. Ashcroft (District Court, District of Columbia 2009)
Jones v. Bernanke (District Court, District of Columbia 2007)
Scott-Blanton v. Universal City Studios Productions LLLP (District Court, District of Columbia 2007)
United States ex rel. Fisher v. Network Software Associates (District Court, District of Columbia 2005)
Bancoult v. McNamara (District Court, District of Columbia 2003)
Humane Society of the United States v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of Interior (D.C. Cir. 1988)
Hotel and Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25 v. William French Smith, U.S. Attorney General (D.C. Cir. 1988)
Gurbisz v. United States Immigration & Naturalization Service (District Court, N.D. Illinois 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s suggestion for rehearing en banc was circulated to the full Court and the taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that appellee’s suggestion is granted and this matter will be reheard by the Court sitting en banc. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the opinion and judgment of October 31, 1986, be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings in this matter.

Circuit Judge RUTH B. GINSBURG did not participate in this order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.