U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1987

United States v. Meyer

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 30, 1987 · Bork, Buckley, Edwards, Ginsburg, Mikva, Robinson, Silberman, Starr, Wald, Williams

259 U.S. App. D.C. 391; 816 F.2d 695; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 9164 (United States Reports)

Cases that cite this one

13 later published cases cite this decision.

Teoume-Lessane v. United States (D.C. 2007)
State v. Korum (Wash. 2006)
United States v. Samuel Scott Raymer (10th Cir. 1991)
United States v. Coleman (United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama 2019)
State v. Korum (Wash. 2006)
State v. Korum (Wash. Ct. App. 2004)
State v. Korum (Wash. Ct. App. 2004)
United States v. Williams (District Court, District of Columbia 1998)
United States v. Alberto Paramo (3d Cir. 1993)
State v. Tsosie (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992)
United States v. Herbert Louis Miller (10th Cir. 1991)
United States v. Frankel (District Court, District of Columbia 1990)
United States v. Secord (District Court, District of Columbia 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc has been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote thereon was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular active service voted in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED, by the court en banc, that appellant’s suggestion for rehearing en banc is granted and it is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the court en , banc, that the opinion and judgment of February 13,1987 be, and the same hereby are, vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings herein.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.