ACME Nat. Window Cleaning Co. v. Jackson
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Layton Fay v. Edwin A. Meese (D.C. Cir. 1988)
- Ned S. Snydor v. Hemingway Transport, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor (D.C. Cir. 1988)
- Iris McKinney v. Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of Transportation (D.C. Cir. 1988)
- United States v. Rodney Patterson (D.C. Cir. 1988)
- James I. Watts v. Norman A. Carlson, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons (D.C. Cir. 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
854 F.2d 528
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
ACME NATIONAL WINDOW CLEANING COMPANY and American Casualty
Co. of Redding, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
Deboyce H. JACKSON and Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor.
No. 86-1543.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
May 17, 1988.
Before RUTH BADER GINSBURG, D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This case was considered on the record and on briefs filed by the parties on petition for review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board, United States Department of Labor. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by the court that the August 12, 1986 Order of the Benefits Review Board be affirmed, essentially for the reasons stated by the Board: (1) the administrative law judge did not address the question whether claimant's left-hand condition contributed to his present disability; and (2) remand is not in order because the record does not contain evidence adequate to support a determination that claimant's pre-existing left-hand condition contributed to his post-accident disability.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.