U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1990

Butts v. Fishbach & Moore & Comstock

Butts v. Fishbach & Moore & Comstock
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 27, 1990
906 F.2d 783; 285 U.S. App. D.C. 89; 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 10918; 1990 WL 93374 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Butts v. Fishbach & Moore & Comstock

Opinion

906 F.2d 783

285 U.S.App.D.C. 89

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Paul E. BUTTS, Petitioner,
v.
FISHBACH & MOORE & COMSTOCK, and Lumbermans Mutual Casualty
Company, and Director, Office of Workers
Compensation Programs, and Department of
Labor, Respondents.

No. 89-1659.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

June 27, 1990.

Before MIKVA, HARRY T. EDWARDS and BUCKLEY, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

1

This case was considered on a petition for review of an order of the Benefits Review Board and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is

2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition be denied.

3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.