Harry P. Miller, Jr. v. Federal Election Commission
Harry P. Miller, Jr. v. Federal Election Commission
Opinion
923 F.2d 201
287 U.S.App.D.C. 378
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Harry P. MILLER, Jr., Appellant,
v.
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION.
No. 89-5394.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
April 25, 1990.
Before MIKVA, BUCKLEY and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellee's motion for summary affirmance and the response thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion filed June 29, 1989. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (per curiam).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.