Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Department of Justice
Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Department of Justice
Opinion
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Henry LAVADO, Jr., Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.
No. 90-5264.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
May 16, 1991.
Before SILBERMAN, BUCKLEY and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellee's motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted. The search conducted by appellee was adequate and "reasonably calculated to discover requested documents." Safecard Services, Inc. v. SEC, 926 F.2d 1197 (D.C.Cir. 1991). The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.