U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1992

United States v. Rickey Whitehead

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided February 5, 1992

953 F.2d 688; 1992 WL 20639 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

953 F.2d 688

293 U.S.App.D.C. 292

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Rickey WHITEHEAD, Appellant.

No. 91-3176.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Feb. 5, 1992.

Before MIKVA Chief Judge, and KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant's convictions be affirmed. The government presented evidence adequate to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that appellant committed each of the crimes charged.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.