Laurack D. Bray v. Chuck Hebble
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Johnson v. Georgetown University (District Court, District of Columbia 2026)
- Doe 1 v. American Federation of Government Employees (District Court, District of Columbia 2021)
- Ss & T, LLC. v. American University (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
976 F.2d 45
298 U.S.App.D.C. 97
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Laurack D. BRAY, Appellant,
v.
Chuck HEBBLE, et al.
No. 90-7127.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Aug. 28, 1992.
Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc
Denied Dec. 4, 1992.
Before WALD, SILBERMAN and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed August 17, 1990, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.