U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1993

United States v. Darnell Barnes

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided April 20, 1993

993 F.2d 913; 301 U.S. App. D.C. 251; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18977; 1993 WL 150640 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion

993 F.2d 913

301 U.S.App.D.C. 251

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Darnell BARNES, Appellant.

No. 91-3319.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

April 20, 1993.

Before: MIKVA, Chief Judge, and D.H. GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This case was considered on the record and on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. The Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.R. 14(c). Therefore, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that appellant's conviction is affirmed because the District Court committed no error in admitting the disputed evidence.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.R. 15(b)(2).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.