Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1993

Beach Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Beach Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided October 22, 1993 · Edwards, Ginsburg, Mikva
10 F.3d 811; 304 U.S. App. D.C. 36; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27855 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Deborah C. Costlow and Thomas C. Power, Washington, DC, were on the brief for petitioners., John E. Ingle, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, F.C.C., Renee Licht, Acting Gen. Counsel, F.C.C., Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Douglas N. Letter and Bruce G. Forrest, Attys., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Washington, DC, were on the brief for respondents.

Beach Communications, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

PER CURIAM:

Upon motion by respondents pursuant to Local Rule 14(e), the Court directs that the order'herein, issued by the Court on October 22, 1993, be published. The order reads as follows:

ORDER

This cause came before the court upon petition for review of an order of the Federal Communications Commission and is presently on remand from the Supreme Court, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 2096, 124 L.Ed.2d 211. Upon consideration of the supplemental briefs of the parties filed pursuant to the order of July 29, 1993, it is

Ordered, by the Court, that the petition for review is dismissed. We find that there is no basis for application of a heightened scrutiny standard as claimed by petitioners and, therefore, there is no remaining meritorious issue to be considered.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.