U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1994

United States v. Anthony Hall

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 28, 1994

22 F.3d 1184; 306 U.S. App. D.C. 102; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17465; 1994 WL 119112 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

22 F.3d 1184

306 U.S.App.D.C. 102

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Anthony HALL, Appellant.

No. 93-3084.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 28, 1994.

Before: WILLIAMS, GINSBURG and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause came to be heard on appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was briefed and argued by counsel. The issues have been accorded full consideration by the Court and occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 36(b). Accordingly, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED by the Court that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.