Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1994

In Re Grant Anderson

In Re Grant Anderson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided July 1, 1994
28 F.3d 1295; 307 U.S. App. D.C. 428; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28920; 1994 WL 329298 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

In Re Grant Anderson

Opinion

28 F.3d 1295

307 U.S.App.D.C. 428

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
In re Grant ANDERSON, Petitioner.

No. 94-8011.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 1, 1994.

PETITION DENIED.

Before: WALD and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

1

Upon consideration of the emergency petition for an extraordinary writ of mandamus, it is

2

ORDERED that the petition be denied. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy, which is not available where the relief sought is available through other means, such as direct appeal. See Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 36 (1980) (per curiam); Kerr v. United States District Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑