U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1994

Joseph C. Steffan v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense

Joseph C. Steffan v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 22, 1994 · Mikva, Wald, Edwards, Silberman, Buckley, Williams, Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers
41 F.3d 677; 309 U.S. App. D.C. 281; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33045; 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 245; 1994 WL 652249 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Marc Wolinsky, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs, were Norman Redlieh, Yineet Bhatia, and Calvin Steinmetz., Mark I. Levy, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept, of Justice, argued the cause for appellees. On the brief were Eric H. Holder, Jr., U.S. Atty., and Frank W. Hunger, Asst. Atty. Gen., U.S. Dept, of Justice, Anthony J. Steinmeyer, John C. Hoyle, and E. Roy Hawkens, Attorneys, U.S. Dept, of Justice., On the brief, for amici curiae American Jewish Committee, et al., was David C. McBride., On the brief, for amicus curiae American Ass’n of University Professors, were Scott L. Nelson, Ann H. Franke, and Robert C. Post., On the brief, for amici curiae American Civil Liberties Union AIDS Project, et al., were William B. Rubenstein, Steven R. Shapiro, and Arthur B. Spitzer., On the brief, for amici curiae NOW Legal Defense and Educ. Fund, et al., was Deborah A. Ellis., On the brief, for amici curiae National Lesbian and Gay Law Ass’n, et al., was Paul R.Q. Wolfson. David C. Vladeck entered an appearance., On the brief, for amici curiae Benjamin W. Jordon, et al., was Arthur A. Schulez, Sr., On the brief, for amici curiae Geneva College Center for Law and Public Policy, et al., was William A. Woodruff., On the brief, for amicus curiae The Judge Advocates Ass’n, was Gerald Miller., On the brief, for amici curiae Naval Aviation Foundation, Inc., et al., was Ronald D. Ray.

Joseph C. Steffan v. William J. Perry, Secretary of Defense

Cases that cite this one

112 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Concurring Opinion

Concurring Opinion

Concurring in Part

Dissenting Opinion

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.