Smith v. Haden
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kituskie v. Corbman (Pa. 1998)
- Linda A. Smith, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Mabel D. Haden, Appellee/cross-Appellant (D.C. Cir. 1995)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
This case was heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is
Ordered that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion of December 23, 1994. See Smith v. Haden, 872 F.Supp. 1040 (D.D.C. 1994). The cross-appeal is therefore moot.
The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a)(1).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.