U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1996

LaShawn A. v. Barry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 30, 1996 · Buckley, Edwards, Ginsburg, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Sentelle, Silberman, Tatel, Wald, Williams

74 F.3d 303; 315 U.S. App. D.C. 400; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4404; 1996 WL 32955 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr. (D.C. Cir. 1996)
Planned Parenthood of AR, etc. v. Cindy Gillespie (8th Cir. 2017)
Messier v. Southbury Training School (United States District Court for the District of Connecticut 1996)
Marisol A. by Next Friend Forbes v. Giuliani (District Court, S.D. New York 1996)
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc. (8th Cir. 1996)
Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc. (8th Cir. 1996)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Upon consideration of appellees’ Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc, and the response thereto, it is

ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the suggestion is granted. This case will be considered and decided by the court sitting in banc. It is

FURTHER ORDERED, by the Court in banc, that the judgment filed herein on October 31,1995 is hereby vacated.

A future order will govern further proceedings.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.