United States v. Levi
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- State Ex Rel. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals (Wis. 2000)
- Blair-Bey v. Quick (D.C. Cir. 1998)
- United States v. Bernard S. Levi, Adrian Williams-El v. United States (D.C. Cir. 1997)
- Blair-Bey, Clarence v. US Parole Commission (D.C. Cir. 1998)
- In re: Stone (5th Cir. 1997)
- Martin v. Bissonete (1st Cir. 1997)
- United States v. Paul L. Barrett (D.C. Cir. 1997)
- Craig Martin v. Lynn Bissonette (1st Cir. 1997)
- In re Louis Elton Stone (5th Cir. 1997)
- Martin v. Bissonete (1st Cir. 1997)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
No. 96-3083 presents the threshold question whether the filing-fee provisions of the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) apply to proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. No. 96-5200 presents the same question with respect to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We publish this opinion in order to express agreement with our sister circuits, which have uniformly held the PLRA inapplicable to such proceedings. See Smith v. Angelone, 111 F.3d 1126, 1129-31 (4th Cir. 1997); Anderson v. Singletary, 111 F.3d 801 (11th Cir. 1997); United States v. Simmonds, 111 F.3d 737, 742-45 (10th Cir. 1997); Naddi v. Hill, 106 F.3d 275, 277 (9th Cir. 1997); United States v. Cole, 101 F.3d 1076, 1077 (5th Cir. 1996); Santana v. United States, 98 F.3d 752, 755-56 (3d Cir. 1996); Martin v. United States, 96 F.3d 853, 855-56 (7th Cir. 1996); Reyes v. Keane, 90 F.3d 676, 678 (2d Cir. 1996).
We need not publish the disposition of the merits of appellants’ appeals, which will issue in separate orders.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.