U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1997

State of North Carolina v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, Intervenor

State of North Carolina v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, Intervenor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 9, 1997 · Wald, Silberman, Sentelle
112 F.3d 1175; 324 U.S. App. D.C. 209; 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20929; 45 ERC (BNA) 1442; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10604; 1997 WL 231175 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Bernard Nash and Patrick M. McSweeney argued the causes for petitioners, with whom Frederick M. Lowther, David L. Engelhardt, William B. Ellis and Alan S. Hirsch, Special Deputy Attorney General, North Carolina Department of Justice, Washington, DC, were on the briefs., Edward S. Geldermann, Attorney, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, argued the cause for respondent, with whom Jerome M. Feit, Solicitor, was on the brief., M. Scott Hart, Washington, DC, argued the cause for intervenor City of Virginia Beach, with whom George A. Somerville and Samuel M. Brock, III were on the brief. Howard E. Shapiro, Michael A. Swiger and John F. Kay, Jr. entered appearances., Lois J. Schiffer, Assistant Attorney General, United States Department of Justice, John A. Bryson, Attorney, Jonathan Z. Cannon, General Counsel, Environmental Protection Agency, and Randolph L. Hill, Attorney, were on the brief for the United States as amicus curiae., John Paul Woodley, Jr., Roger L. Chaffe and John R. Butcher were on the brief for the Commonwealth of Virginia as amicus curiae., Alan H. Richardson, Donald H. Clarke and Henri D. Bartholomot were on the joint brief for the American Public Power Association, et al., as amicus curiae., Ronald A. Shems, Assistant Attorney General, State of Vermont, was on the brief for the states of Vermont, et al., as amicus curiae.

State of North Carolina v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the City of Virginia Beach, Virginia, Intervenor

Cases that cite this one

28 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.