U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 1997

Matson Terminals, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Matson Terminals, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 10, 1997 · Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson
114 F.3d 300; 324 U.S. App. D.C. 446; 155 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2449; 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 13621 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Eugene Scalia,Washington, DC, argued the cause for petitioner, with whom Kenneth W. Anderson and Scott A. Kruse, Los Angeles, CA, were on the briefs., Meredith L. Jason, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent, with whom Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Peter D. Winkler, Supervisory Attorney, were on the brief.

Matson Terminals, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.