U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2003

Kimberlin v. United States Department of Justice

Kimberlin v. United States Department of Justice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided October 28, 2003 · Sentelle, Henderson, Tatel
351 F.3d 1165; 359 U.S. App. D.C. 21; 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 21971 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Kimberlin v. United States Department of Justice

Opinion

On Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing

Before: SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL, * Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of the appellants’ petition for panel rehearing, filed on March 28, 2003, and the appellees’ response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied. Our panel disposition of this case remains unchanged after the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Overton v. Bazzetta, 539 U.S. 126, 123 S.Ct. 2162, 156 L.Ed.2d 162 (2003). To the extent that Overton may affect our determination that we “need not invoke the four factor analysis the United States Supreme Court established in Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 2261-62, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987),” Kimberlin v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 318 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C.Cir. 2003), our alternative disposition, that the prison regulations banning electric and *22 electronic musical instruments satisfy Safley’s test, remains intact, see id. at 233-34.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.