Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2003

Defenders of Wildlife v. Norton

Defenders of Wildlife v. Norton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided September 2, 2003
74 F. App'x 63

Counsel

Eric Robert Glitzenstein, Katherine Anne Meyer, Meyer & Glitzenstein, William John Snape, III, Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellee., David Carlisle Shilton, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee., Virginia Swisshelm Abrecht, Robert L. Gulley, Andrew Jacob Turner, Douglas Scott Burdin, Hunton & Williams, William P. Horn, Birch, Horton, Bittner & Cherot, Washington, DC, John B. Weldon, Jr., Salmon, Lewis & Weldon, Phoenix, AZ, Richard M. Frank, Sacramento, CA, Peter Emmerich von Haam, Los Angeles, CA, Mary Elizabeth Hackenbracht, Oakland, CA for Movant Intervenor-Appellant., Edward Joseph McGrath, Kellie A. Donnelly, Sullivan & Worcester, Washington, DC, Lisa Michelle McKnight, Salmon, Lewis & Weldon, Gregg A. Houtz, William Patrick Schiffer, Phoenix, AZ, James H. Davenport, Las Vegas, NV, for Movant Intervenor-Appellee.

Defenders of Wildlife v. Norton

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the district court’s order entered March 31, 2003, denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting defendants’ cross-motion for summary judgment; the district court’s order entered June 4, 2003, denying plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration; and the expiration of the time for filing a notice of appeal on August 4, 2003, see Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), without any such notice being filed, it is hereby

ORDERED that this appeal from the order of the district court denying appel*64lants leave to intervene as of right be dismissed as moot.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.