U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2004

Odah v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided July 19, 2004

103 F. App'x 676

Counsel

Neil H. Koslowe, Thomas B. Wilner, Shearman & Sterling, Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Roscoe Conklin Howard, Jr., U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Paul D. Clement, Gregory George Garre, David B. Salmons, Attorney, Robert Mark Loeb, Attorney, Douglas N. Letter, Litigation Counsel, Gregory George Katsas, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees., William J. Aceves, San Diego, CA, Amicus Curiae for Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Jones v. United States of America (District Court, District of Columbia 2013)
Basardh v. Obama (District Court, District of Columbia 2009)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that, in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Rasul v. Bush, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2686, 159 L.Ed.2d 548 (2004), the court’s judgment filed March 11, 2003, in the above-captioned consolidated cases be vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court appealed from in these causes be reversed and these cases remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Rasul v. Bush, 124 S.Ct. 2686 (2004). The Clerk is direct-. ed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.