In re Hinton
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Weedon v. United States (District Court, District of Columbia 2009)
- United States v. Gibson (District Court, District of Columbia 2008)
- Winchester v. United States (District Court, District of Columbia 2007)
- McCants v. United States (District Court, District of Columbia 2007)
- In re: Zambrano (D.C. Cir. 2006)
- United States v. Waite (District Court, District of Columbia 2005)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Upon consideration of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; the motion for waiver of fees; and the motion for leave to file a successive motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and the opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be granted. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for waiver of fees be dismissed as moot. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for leave to file a successive § 2255 motion be denied. The Supreme Court has not made either Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), or United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. See, e.g., Green v. United States, 397 F.3d 101, 2005 WL 237204, *1 (2d Cir. Feb.2, 2005) (denying motion for leave to file successive § 2255 motion because the Supreme Court has not made either Blakely or Booker retroactive to cases on collateral review); United States v. Anderson, 396 F.3d 1336 (11th Cir. 2005) (same).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.