U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2005

Edmonds v. Department of Justice

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided May 6, 2005

161 F. App'x 6

Counsel

Arthur Barry Spitzer, American Civil Liberties Union of National Captial Area, Mark Steven Zaid, Krieger & Zaid, PLLC, Washington, DC, Ann Elizabeth Beeson, Melissa Allison Goodman, Benjamin Elihu Wizner, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY, for Appellant., Kenneth L. Wainstein, U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Douglas N. Letter, Litigation Counsel, H. Thomas Byron, III, Attorney, Peter Douglas Keisler, Gregory Geoi’ge Katsas, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellees., Kevin Taylor Baine, Adam Lawrence Perlman, Kevin Hardy, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, for Intervenors., Michael T. Kirkpatrick, Public Citizen Litigation Group, David Charney Vladeck, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC, Amicus Curiae for Appellants.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Edmonds v. United States (District Court, District of Columbia 2008)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

This cause was considered on the record from the United States District Court and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the order of the district court dismissing Edmonds’ claims is hereby affirmed for the reasons given in that court’s opinion, 323 F.Supp.2d 65 (D.D.C. 2004).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.