U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2005

Frank v. Chertoff

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided December 5, 2005 · Brown, Henderson, Randolph

171 F. App'x 860

Counsel

Ira L. Frank, Springfield, VA, pro se., R. Craig Lawrence, Michael Joseph Ryan, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, Kenneth L. Wainstein, U.S. Attorney, Alan Burch, John Francis Henault, Jr., U.S. Attorney’s Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Frederick Schlottman v. Thomas Perez (D.C. Cir. 2014)
Perry v. Ross (District Court, District of Columbia 2022)
Schlottman v. Solis (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
Schlottman v. Solis (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 26, 2004, be affirmed. The district court correctly determined it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellant’s Title VII claims.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.