U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2006

United States v. Henry

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided November 16, 2006 · Rogers, Sentelle, Silberman

207 F. App'x 3

Counsel

Teresa A. Wallbaum, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Washington, DC, for Appellee., Jenifer Wicks, Law Office of Jennifer Wicks, Washington, DC, for Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Henry (District Court, District of Columbia 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs by the parties. The Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(b). It is

Ordered And Adjudged that the judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.