U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2007

McDermott v. Gonzales

McDermott v. Gonzales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided January 17, 2007 · Henderson, Randolph, Tatel
215 F. App'x 1

McDermott v. Gonzales

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed May 11, 2006, be affirmed. The district court correctly determined that appellant’s constitutional rights are not violated by the city of San Francisco in permitting the annual gay, lesbian, and bisexual parade, see Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, 515 U.S. 557, 115 S.Ct. 2338, 132 L.Ed.2d 487 (1995), and that his constitutional rights are not violated by the federal government’s decision not to investigate his complaint about the parade. See Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 833, 105 S.Ct. 1649, 84 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.