U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2007

Bell v. Police Department

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 14, 2007

226 F. App'x 10

Counsel

Kareemah Yasmina Bell, Washington, DC, pro se., Edward Eugene Schwab, Deputy Attorney General, Office of Attorney General for the District of Columbia Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Anthony McDaniel Jr. v. SST. Alton (United States District Court for the Central District of California 2023)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and appendix filed by appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed February 9, 2007, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332; nor does the complaint allege any other basis for the district court’s jurisdiction.

*11Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 86, this disposition -will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc.

See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.