U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2008

Al Odah ex rel. Al Odah v. United States

Al Odah ex rel. Al Odah v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided June 25, 2008 · Randolph, Rogers, Sentelle
282 F. App'x 844

Counsel

David J. Cynamon, Matthew Jeffrey MacLean, Osman Ahmad Handoo, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, LLP, Neil H. Koslowe, Thomas B. Wilner, Shearman & Sterling, Washington, DC, for Appellants., Eric David Miller, Federal Communications Commission, Robert Mark Loeb, Douglas N. Letter, Litigation Counsel, Catherine Y. Hancock, Paul D. Clement, Gregory George Katsas, Peter Douglas Keisler, Kenneth L. Wainstein, Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Al Odah ex rel. Al Odah v. United States

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

It is ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Boumediene v. Bush, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 2229, 171 L.Ed.2d 41 (2008), the court’s judgment filed February 20, 2007, 476 F.3d 981, in the above-captioned consolidated cases be vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that these cases be remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion in Boumediene v. Bush. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.