U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2008

Lewis v. Fenty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided September 10, 2008

296 F. App'x 75

Counsel

Barbara J. Lewis, Radcliffe B. Lewis, Washington, DC, for Appellants., Edward Eugene Schwab, Deputy Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia Office of the Solicitor General, Washington, DC, for Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Lewis v. Government of the District of Columbia (District Court, District of Columbia 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the rec-oi’d from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellants. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 22, 2008, 534 F.Supp.2d 20, be affirmed. The district court propei’ly dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because it is not a civil action arising under federal law, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, or between citizens of different states with an amount in controversy of more than $75,000, see 28 U.S.C. § 1332; nor does the complaint allege any other basis for the district court’s jurisdiction.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.