Ruston v. Bush
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (District Court, District of Columbia 2010)
- Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (District Court, District of Columbia 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief fried by the appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order fried on March 25, 2008, be affirmed. The district court properly dismissed this action as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), because the allegations lack an arguable basis either in law or fact. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989). The complaint contains factual allegations that are so implausible as to be “fantastic or delusional.” Id. at 328, 109 S.Ct. 1827.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.