Hilska v. Suter
Cases that cite this one
10 later published cases cite this decision.
- Sibley v. U.S. Supreme Court (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Sibley v. United States Supreme Court (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- Jones v. United States Supreme Court (District Court, District of Columbia 2010)
- Gwen v. Jimenez (District Court, District of Columbia 2026)
- Christian v. Boulware Jr. (District Court, District of Columbia 2021)
- Smith v. Mbi Inc. (District Court, District of Columbia 2019)
- Stone v. Zipps (District Court, District of Columbia 2019)
- Sibley v. Macaluso (District Court, District of Columbia 2013)
- Simon v. Bickell (District Court, District of Columbia 2010)
- Simon v. Bickell (District Court, District of Columbia 2010)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed June 30, 2008 be affirmed. Lower courts have no supervisory authority over the Supreme Court or its employees. See, e.g., Marin v. Suter, 956 F.2d 339, 340 (D.C.Cir. 1992) (per curiam). Furthermore, clerks enjoy absolute immunity from damages for performance of tasks that are an integral part of the judicial process, see Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C.Cir. 1993) (per curiam), and the district court correctly held that the Attorney General is without authority to dissolve such immunity.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.