Rattler v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Rattler v. Department of Health and Human Services (District Court, District of Columbia 2014)
- Rattler v. Department of Health and Human Services (District Court, District of Columbia 2013)
- Rattler v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and supplement filed by the appel
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed August 31, 2010, be affirmed. Appellant has not identified any error in the district court’s conclusion that the complaint was frivolous because “it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.