Loma Linda University Medical Center v. Sebelius
Cases that cite this one
21 later published cases cite this decision.
- Edward W. Sparrow Hospital Ass'n v. Sebelius (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
- University Medical Center, Inc. v. Sebelius (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Blue Water Baltimore v. McCarthy (District Court, District of Columbia 2019)
- Mercy General Hospital v. Burwell (District Court, District of Columbia 2018)
- East Texas Medical Center Athens v. Price (District Court, District of Columbia 2018)
- Accrediting Council for Indep. Colls. & Sch. v. Devos (D.C. Cir. 2018)
- E. Tex. Med. Center-Athens v. Azar (D.C. Cir. 2018)
- Onafeko v. United States Department of Homeland Security (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)
- New Lifecare Hospitals of North Carolina LLC v. Cochran (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)
- Tomasi v. Twp. of Long Beach (District Court, D. New Jersey 2019)
- Stewart v. Azar (D.C. Cir. 2018)
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. United States Army Corps of Engineers (District Court, District of Columbia 2017)
- International Exports, Inc. v. Hagel (District Court, District of Columbia 2017)
- Lannett Company, Inc. v. United States Food and Drug Administration (District Court, District of Columbia 2017)
- International Exports, Inc. v. Mattis (D.C. Cir. 2017)
- Nat'l Venture Capital Ass'n v. Duke (D.C. Cir. 2017)
- ['PUBLIC EMPLOYEES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSIBILITY v. BROMWICH'] (District Court, District of Columbia 2014)
- Lind v. McHugh (District Court, District of Columbia 2014)
- American Petroleum Institute v. Securities and Exchange Commission (District Court, District of Columbia 2013)
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania v. Sebelius (District Court, District of Columbia 2012)
- Edward W. Sparrow Hospital Association v. Leavitt (District Court, District of Columbia 2011)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This appeal from a judgement of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court and briefed and argued by the parties. The court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a published opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(d). It is hereby
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment to appellee be affirmed. Appellee did not receive notice “with ‘ascertainable certainty,’ ” Gen. Elec. Co. v. EPA, 53 F.3d 1324, 1329 (D.C.Cir. 1995) (quoting Diamond Roofing Co. v. OSHRC, 528 F.2d 645, 649 (5th Cir. 1976)), of the billing deadline for seeking payment for medical education costs associated with Medicare + Choice (Part C) inpatient days. Moreover, appellant failed to “ ‘provide an explanation that will enable the court to evaluate the agency’s rationale’ ” for rejecting appellee’s proposed alternative computation method. Dickson v. Sec’y of Def., 68 F.3d 1396, 1404 (D.C.Cir. 1995) (quoting Pension Benefit Guar. Corp. v. LTV Corp., 496 U.S. 633, 654, 110 S.Ct. 2668, 110 L.Ed.2d 579 (1990)). Accordingly, the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.