Paul Bame v. Todd Dillard
Paul Bame v. Todd Dillard
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
No. 09-5330 September Term, 2010 FILED ON : MARCH 29, 2011
PAUL BAME , ET AL., APPELLEES
v.
TODD W. DILLARD , IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPICITY (FORMER UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ), APPELLANT
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:05-cv-01833)
Before: GINSBURG and ROGERS, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge
ORDER
It is ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the dissenting opinion issued on March 25, 2011, be amended as follows:
On page 4, first full paragraph, delete lines 9-14 beginning with the citation “Pearson v. Callahan and ending at 823.”, and insert in lieu thereof:
“Pearson v. Callahan, 129 S. Ct. 808 (2009). There the Supreme Court concluded that the narcotics task force officers were entitled to rely on the consensus among the courts to the consent-once-removed doctrine at the time of their warrantless entry into a home, despite the lack of a ruling from the officers’ own federal circuit, id. at 823.”
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: /s/ Jennifer M. Clark Deputy Clerk
Reference
- Status
- Published