Bayala v. United States Department of Homeland Security

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Bayala v. United States Department of Homeland Security, 599 F. App'x 389 (D.C. Cir. 2015)
Henderson, Pillard, Srinivasan

Bayala v. United States Department of Homeland Security

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (per curiam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.

Reference

Full Case Name
Florent BAYALA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Office of the General Counsel
Status
Published