U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 2015

Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Protection

Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Protection
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Decided March 24, 2015 · Griffith, Millett, Rogers
599 F. App'x 390

Sczygelski v. United States Customs & Border Protection

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the reply, it is

ORDERED that the motion be denied. The merits of the parties’ positions are not so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir. 1987) (per cu-riam).

Because the court has determined that summary disposition is not in order, the Clerk is instructed to calendar this case for presentation to a merits panel.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.