McCain v. Bank of America N.A.
Cases that cite this one
24 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Louis v. Hagel (District Court, District of Columbia 2016)
- Fam v. Bank of America NA (USA) (District Court, District of Columbia 2017)
- Miller v. Mayorkas (District Court, District of Columbia 2025)
- Miller v. Mayorkas (District Court, D. Maryland 2025)
- Goode v. amazon.com, Inc. (District Court, District of Columbia 2025)
- Pilling v. Austin (District Court, District of Columbia 2024)
- Pilling v. Austin (District Court, W.D. Michigan 2024)
- Scg America Group Inc. v. Starlight Security Inc. (District Court, District of Columbia 2023)
- Ballard v. Disbrow (District Court, District of Columbia 2022)
- Milowski v. Wolf (District Court, District of Columbia 2021)
- Tomasello v. Greenzweig (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)
- Wattleton v. Mnuchin (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)
- O'Meara v. Esper (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)
- Skipton v. RevHoney, Inc. (District Court, W.D. Missouri 2020)
- O'Meara v. Wormuth (District Court, E.D. Virginia 2020)
- Bell v. United States of America (District Court, District of Columbia 2019)
- Lkq Corporation v. United States of America (District Court, District of Columbia 2019)
- Owens v. Bank of America, Na (District Court, District of Columbia 2018)
- Webster v. Potter (District Court, District of Columbia 2016)
- Nigerians in Diaspora Organization Americas v. Ogbonnia (District Court, District of Columbia 2016)
- Walsh v. Bank of America NA (District Court, District of Columbia 2015)
- Walker v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC (District Court, District of Columbia 2015)
- Walker v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC (District Court, District of Columbia 2015)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the ree- . ord from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed January 30, 2014, be affirmed. The district court correctly determined venue for appellant’s claims does not lie in the District of Columbia. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). The district court also did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s complaint rather than transferring it to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). See Naartex Consulting Corp. v. Watt, 722 F.2d 779, 789 (D.C.Cir. 1983).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.