Ellis v. Commissioner
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Ellis v. Jackson (District Court, District of Columbia 2018)
- Ellis v. Jackson (D.C. Cir. 2018)
- McNeil v. Irs Commissioner (District Court, District of Columbia 2016)
- Gu v. United States Department of the Treasury (District Court, District of Columbia 2025)
- Cowtown Foundation Inc v. U.S. Department of Agriculture (District Court, District of Columbia 2023)
- Martins-Gadiole v. Garland (5th Cir. 2022)
- NetJets Aviation, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Agriculture (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2022)
- Passut v. Devos (District Court, District of Columbia 2021)
- Ciox Health, LLC v. Hargan (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)
- Mirv Holdings, LLC v. United States General Services Administration (District Court, District of Columbia 2020)
- Libertarian National Committee, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission (District Court, District of Columbia 2017)
- Depolo V.ciraolo-klepper (District Court, District of Columbia 2016)
- National Veterans Legal Services Program v. United States Department of Defense (District Court, District of Columbia 2016)
- DePolo v. Ciraolo-Klepper (District Court, District of Columbia 2016)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
Upon consideration of the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs filed by the parties, see Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j); the motion for judicial notice and the response thereto; the motion to expedite briefing and the response thereto; the motion for injunction; the motion for sanctions, the response thereto, and the reply; the motion for a temporary restraining order; the motion to amend the record; the motion to withdraw as moot the motion for injunction; the motion for hearing on the motion for a temporary restraining order; the motion for eviden-tiary hearing, the response thereto, and
ORDERED that the motion to withdraw as moot the motion for injunction be granted. The Clerk is directed to withdraw the motion for injunction. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to expedite briefing be dismissed as moot. It is.
FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining motions be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed September 16, 2014, and December 3, 2014, be affirmed. Appellant has not shown that the district court erred in concluding that his claims are barred by the Anti-Injunction Act, the purpose of which is to allow the government to assess and collect taxes without judicial interference. See 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a) (“[N]o suit for the purpose of restraining the assessment or collection of any tax shall be maintained in any court by any person, whether or not such person is the person against whom such tax was assessed.”); Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co., 370 U.S. 1, 7, 82 S.Ct. 1126, 8 L.Ed.2d 292 (1962).
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.